serious rkhunter warnings not seen before (by me).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just finished doing my weekly patches for my F32 workstation. The sequence (done as root):
1. rkhunter --check
(clean)
2. dnf --refresh upgrade dnf
(nothing to do)
3. dnf upgrade
(no hint of trouble)
4. reboot
(no hint of trouble)
5. rkhunter --check
(trouble!)

I put the rkhunter log file on the google drive; here is the link:
"https://drive.google.com/file/d/1asJQhjhffxOklGivzFLeKV5-gaEVCwYX/view?usp=sharing";.

The file properties checks warning are common after a weekly patching; ignore those.

The first warning of concern is line #1470:
"[12:33:02]     Checking for file '/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9'   [ Warning ]
[12:33:02]     Checking for file '/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9' [ Warning ]
[12:33:02]     Checking for file '/usr/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9' [ Warning ]
[12:33:02] Checking for file '/usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9' [ Warning ]".

The next is in line #1602:
"[12:33:08] Warning: Checking for possible rootkit files and directories [ Warning ] [12:33:08] Found file '/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component [12:33:08] Found file '/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component [12:33:08] Found file '/usr/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component [12:33:08] Found file '/usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component".

Both warnings above are in the section
"[12:32:58] Info: Starting test name 'possible_rkt_files'
[12:32:58]   Performing check of possible rootkit files and directories",
which starts at line 1388.

Below this section are numerous other warnings about other processes using suspicious files.

My workstation was clean;
I patched;
now rkhunter says my system is contaminated.
I had nothing else running during the scanning and patching except a terminal (in which I did the patching), ksysguard, and xeyes.

Are the warnings actual problems or false alarms?
If the problems are real, how do I fix?  Re-installing is impractical.

Are there contaminated packages in the repositories?

thanks,
Bill.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux