On 9/1/20 1:31 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > The devs seem amenable, but are vastly under-resourced IMO. For my money, better Fedora support ==> more Redhat support contract adoption. > > But that's a corporate Redhat/IBM issue that they've yet to come to terms with and focus on. Unless you're a bank, airline, government, etc :-/ it's funny you said that because i almost included something similar in my original mail. At roughly a billion $ a quarter in gross revenue(IIRC), i think Red Hat should double/triple down on Fedora and CentOS. What would happen to RH revenue (down the line) if Fedora and CentOS started to completely dominate market share for smaller institutions? Why would enterprises use another OS/distro if all the users, admins and devs only/mainly know Fedora/CentOS b/c that's what they use at school and work. i.e. The Windows Effect. Fedora and CentOS are doing a lot of things right (that's why i'm in the process of moving to them for various things), but just imagine if it were all really well funded, and got to all the people doing the work. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
