On 17/12/2019 17:21, Richard Shaw
wrote:
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as I expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can be modified).2. It uses a custom build system (wmake) and the documentation seems to indicate that it builds and installs all in one shot. Not a roadblock but that does conflict with the %build %install process we use in spec files.
There's other smaller issues (for how little I looked into it, may be more big problems).
As the packaging would be non-trivial, someone who uses the package would be the best maintainer for said package.
Thanks,Richard
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have been using OpenFOAM on Fedora and Redhat/Centos7 for many years using an RPM who's spec file was available somewhere. I had modified the SPEC file for the OpenFOAM 2.3.0 version. It hasn't been updated for some time. I suspect there is a later version RPM spec file somewhere, if not I could dig out the old SRPM I have if someone wants to generate an up-to date RPM for Fedora.
Terry
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx