On 8/28/19 8:09 PM, Tom H wrote: > On an nfsv4-only system with its iptables rules flushed. "showmount > ..." doesn't even work locally (because it needs "rpc.mountd"). > > # iptables -nL > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > # rpcinfo -s > program version(s) netid(s) service owner > 100000 2,3,4 local,udp,tcp,udp6,tcp6 portmapper superuser > 100003 4 tcp6,tcp nfs superuser > > # cat /etc/exports > /srv 192.168.0.0/24(rw,sync,no_root_squash) > > # exportfs > /srv 192.168.0.0/24 > > # cat /var/lib/nfs/etab > /srv 192.168.0.0/24(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,nocrossmnt,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,acl,no_pnfs,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534,sec=sys,rw,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash) > > # showmount -e > clnt_create: RPC: Program not registered > > # mount 192.168.0.127:/srv /mnt > > # findmnt /mnt > TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS > /mnt 192.168.0.127:/srv nfs4 > rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.168.0.127,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.0.127 > > # cat /var/lib/nfs/rmtab > > # showmount -d > clnt_create: RPC: Program not registered > > # Interesting. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. But I thought I had it confined to V4 with the entry in /etc/nfs.conf. [root@meimei ~]# mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=3 f30k:/home /mnt mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported But of course [root@meimei ~]# mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=4 f30k:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# df | grep mnt f30k:/home 29110528 10145024 17463808 37% /mnt And.... [root@meimei ~]# showmount -e f30k Export list for f30k: /home 192.168.1.0/24,2001:B030:112F:0000::/56 As well as [root@f30-k ~]# showmount -e Export list for f30-k.greshko.com: /home 192.168.1.0/24,2001:B030:112F:0000::/56 [root@f30-k ~]# rpcinfo -s program version(s) netid(s) service owner 100000 2,3,4 local,udp,tcp,udp6,tcp6 portmapper superuser 100005 2,1 tcp6,udp6,tcp,udp mountd superuser 100024 1 tcp6,udp6,tcp,udp status 29 100003 4 tcp6,tcp nfs superuser Shows that I have a mountd even though it should not be necessary. Maybe I'll track down tomorrow why that is. -- If simple questions can be answered with a simple google query then why are there so many of them? _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx