On 7/9/19 2:14 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/8/19 3:28 AM, François Patte wrote: >> So, I did "dnf history" and get the id, I did "dnf history 144" and get: >> >> 144 | remove ssmtp | 2019-07-08 00:00 | Removed | 113 EE >> >> As I told in my first mail: more the 100 packages were removed. If you >> want the list I can provide it. > > The list might be useful. Unfortunately, it doesn't show the reasons for the removals. > Did you not see that it was going to remove all those packages before you told dnf to go > ahead? > > I don't have ssmtp installed and I have google-chrome-stable installed, so it definitely > isn't a direct dependency. But I think I know why. Do you have sendmail or postfix > installed? All those packages probably require a mail sending program and you removed > the one that is installed by default. If I try to remove postfix, then dnf says it will > remove chrome as well. FWIW, not my experience. [root@f29bk ~]# rpm -q google-chrome-stable ssmtp postfix google-chrome-stable-75.0.3770.100-1.x86_64 ssmtp-2.64-22.fc30.x86_64 postfix-3.4.4-3.fc30.x86_64 [root@f29bk ~]# dnf erase postfix Dependencies resolved. =================================================================================== Package Architecture Version Repository Size =================================================================================== Removing: postfix x86_64 2:3.4.4-3.fc30 @updates 5.5 M Transaction Summary =================================================================================== Remove 1 Package Freed space: 5.5 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx