On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 19:00:32 -0300 Martín Marqués <martin.marques@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to file a bug report in bugzilla.redhat.com and seem to be > having a hard time finding the package in question. > > For some reason, even though the package exists in fc30, the bugzilla > interface doesn't have python2-virtualenv in it's database and so I > can't file the bug report. > > FYI, it seems that down the road between fc28 and fc30 (don't have an > fc29 handy to test this) the python2-virtualenv package doesn't come > with `/usr/bin/virtualenv`. Is there a reason for the missing binary? I can't answer the question about why /usr/bin/virtualenv isn't present in the python2 package, but it might have to do with the deprecation of python2 in fc30, and drop from fc31 to the extent possible (end of python2 maintenance is in 2020). It might only be in the python3 package. > And in any case, how is it that bugzilla doesn't list a package that > is clearly in the fc30 release? > > # rpm -qa | grep python2-virtualenv > python2-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch The src.rpm is python-virtualenv, and it creates python-virtualenv-doc-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch.rpm python2-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch.rpm python2-virtualenv-python26-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch.rpm python3-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch.rpm python3-virtualenv-python26-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch.rpm So you should file the bugzilla against python-virtualenv. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
