Hi, Martín Marqués wrote: > I'm trying to file a bug report in bugzilla.redhat.com and seem to be > having a hard time finding the package in question. > > For some reason, even though the package exists in fc30, the bugzilla > interface doesn't have python2-virtualenv in it's database and so I can't > file the bug report. > > FYI, it seems that down the road between fc28 and fc30 (don't have an fc29 > handy to test this) the python2-virtualenv package doesn't come with > `/usr/bin/virtualenv`. Is there a reason for the missing binary? > > And in any case, how is it that bugzilla doesn't list a package that is > clearly in the fc30 release? > > # rpm -qa | grep python2-virtualenv > python2-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch The bugzilla component is the source rpm, not any of the multiple binary packages built from it. In this case, it's python-virtualenv. You can get the source rpm for a given package via 'rpm -qi <package>' or 'dnf info <package>'. -- Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
