On Sun, 2019-02-03 at 07:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2/3/19 1:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:02 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > Ed Greshko writes: > > > > > > > Well, it would be good to.... > > > > > > > > Stop firewalld, dump the IPTables, start the VPN daemon, wait a bit, and > > > > dump the IPTables > > > > again. > > > > > > > > Also, it would be helpful to actually name the commercial VPN which may warn > > > > others about > > > > the pitfall. > > > Pretty sure it's Cisco Anyconnect. > > No, it's ExpressVPN. > > > > > Hummm.... They offer a 30-Day money back guarantee. Tempting. I find them pretty good overall. Not the cheapest but very good performance in my experience. You get what you pay for in this area. They also rate highly in various surveys as regards security, DNS leak prevention etc. > Oh, and 24/7 Support. Thought about asking them? I've previously asked them about split tunnelling, which they do support on other platforms but not on Linux. They said they would bear it in mind for some future date. In fact my main use-case for the Fedora guest is exactly that: I want to run a VPN within the guest while using a "normal" network connection outside it. This does work, or did until the present issue cropped up. I may ask them about the current issue but am not very hopeful of a solution. In any case I can work around it. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
