On 11/1/18 9:21 AM, rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
yesterday, did system-upgrade to fedora 29, went very smoothly, almost
everything continued working out of the box except that i could no
longer "vpnc" into my current client. i checked with their IT guy, who
could see the incoming request and confirmed that everything seemed fine.
then i looked at the interface created for the VPN tunnel:
tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1412
inet REDACTED netmask 255.255.255.255 destination REDACTED
inet6 fe80::1f2f:331c:9941:aff2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
txqueuelen 500 (UNSPEC)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
You need to provide more details about what isn't working. The tunnel
interface has an IP address. I see that there are no packets
transferred though. Does "ip route" show the right routing? How are
you running vpnc? Can you provide the relevant log messages or vpnc output?
i don't recall all that "unspec
00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00"
being there before (if it was, maybe i just never noticed it).
is this normal? or do i now have to add something to /etc/vpnc/default.conf
to deal with that?
I see this on F28 as well and I'm pretty sure it's been there for a long
time.
i have no idea whether iscsi is relevant to this, just thought i'd throw it
out there in case it was.
It's not relevant. I think there's some trigger related to network
interfaces changing.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
