On 06/18/18 16:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I don't have much hope there, the problem needs to be fixed before I upgrade to F28
> but I need to establish priorities at times.
>
> The last screen-full displayed on my monitor for [root@Box10 bobg]# strace lshw -
Well, the last part of what you see looks like this...
>
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/local/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/lshw/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices", O_RDONLY) = -1 EPERM (Operation
> not permitted)
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/bus/usb/devices", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0x74} ---
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
While on my system it this at that point...
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/local/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/lshw/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/share/usb.ids", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
access("/sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices", F_OK) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices", O_RDONLY) = -1 EPERM (Operation not
permitted)
access("/proc/bus/usb/devices", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
I don't know the significance in the difference. Many times I've found the segfault
to be due to some library issue and it is clear as to where to look. Maybe someone
else knows more.
--
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/U7NIVFTJVGHHULVPP5ZGAF4JJVB5THSM/
