On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote: > On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it >>> was an official Fedora one. > Ed Greshko: >> Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the >> "fedora" name for that very reason. > I have mixed feelings about that. I see the confusion it causes, but > when dealing with other repos, you want to be able to see that you've > got the right one. > > If /other/ repo sites named their "for Fedora" repos actually including > the words "for-fedora," it would alleviate both issues. > IMO, I feel the problem with using the Fedora name in a repo or site makes people think it is formally affiliated with and endorsed by The Fedora Project. Companies such as Disney, Apple, Samsung, and others go to great lengths to protect their brand. Why should Fedora be any different? -- A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
