On 14/2/18 12:34 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it was
an official Fedora one.
Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the "fedora" name for
that very reason.
Hi Ed, just my 2 cents worth, I have the same setup as Patrick, and like
Patrick I use the negativo17 repositories for Nvidia (I found rpmfusion
to be not reliable enough with their binary files for nvidia), but I'm
also using their repositories for Handbrake and Steam. I didn't have any
issues with the repository name of Fedora-Multimedia, to me it was
obvious what it was. Negativo17 supports multiple distributions and to
me it makes perfect sense to name the repositories for the distribution
they are for, the only source of potential confusion could be where he
uses the same repository name for different versions of the same
distribution.
This is just my opinion and other people may have a completely different
view.
regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
