Re: dillo's ssl support does not work with F26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:27:03 -0400 Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 17-09-06 14:03:44, Rick Stevens wrote:
> > On 09/06/2017 09:40 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Dillo's ssl support seems to be broken in F26 (and has been since  
> > the day it was released). Here is what happens:
> > >
> > > Go to https://www.nytimes.com/
> > >
> > > The webpage says that Dillo's prototype plugin for https support is  
> > disabled.
> > >
> > > I downloaded the src.rpm to see what the problem was with the .spec  
> > file and found that nothing has changed. Specifically, the following  
> > is there (as it was for the F25 spec):
> > >
> > > %configure --disable-dependency-tracking --enable-ipv6 --enable-ssl
> > >
> > > So, then I was wondering why this has stopped working with dillo  
> > with F26. Any ideas for a fix?
> > 
> > It's very odd. I built the source RPM and the configuration failed the
> > SSL library test saying it can't find SSL_library_init(), thus it  
> > isn't
> > enabling SSL (below is culled from the config.log file after a  
> > "rpmbuild
> > -bc dillo.spec"):
>   ...
> > | /* Override any GCC internal prototype to avoid an error.
> > |    Use char because int might match the return type of a GCC
> > |    builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
> > | #ifdef __cplusplus
> > | extern "C"
> > | #endif
> > | char SSL_library_init ();
> > | int
> > | main ()
> > | {
> > | return SSL_library_init ();
> > |   ;
> > |   return 0;
> > | }
> > configure:6208: result: no
> > configure:6224: WARNING: *** No libssl found. Disabling ssl  
> > support.***
>   ...
> 
> Looks like the same sort of problem as with balsa email client, or
> actually libesmtp:  not compatible with openssl-1.1 [1].
> 
> [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483350

I don't completely understand the solution. Does this mean that the patch should be made against libesmtp?

Should I file a bug report for libesmtp?

Thanks,
Ranjan
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux