Re: [F25] Help: latest update broke nvidia driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/03/2017 01:35 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Sherman Grunewagen <sugarwagon@xxxxxxx
> <mailto:sugarwagon@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On 08/03/2017 10:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> 
>         Ok, for the same nvidia module and kernel version for me...
> 
>         Dependencies resolved.
>         ================================================================================
>           Package                             Arch   Version         
>         Repository    Size
>         ================================================================================
>         Installing:
>           kmod-nvidia-4.11.12-200.fc25.x86_64 x86_64 2:375.66-3.fc25 
>         @commandline 6.1 M
> 
>         Transaction Summary
>         ================================================================================
>         Install  1 Package
> 
>         Total size: 6.1 M
>         Installed size: 18 M
>         Downloading Packages:
>         Running transaction check
>         Waiting for process with pid 13941 to finish.
>         Transaction check succeeded.
>         Running transaction test
>         Transaction test succeeded.
>         Running transaction
>            Installing  :
>         kmod-nvidia-4.11.12-200.fc25.x86_64-2:375.66-3.fc25.x86_6   1/1
>            Verifying   :
>         kmod-nvidia-4.11.12-200.fc25.x86_64-2:375.66-3.fc25.x86_6   1/1
> 
>         Installed:
>            kmod-nvidia-4.11.12-200.fc25.x86_64.x86_64 2:375.66-3.fc25
> 
> 
>     Is this from the akmods log or did you install the kmod-nvidia
>     module manually with dnf from
>     the rpmfusion repo (if that's even possible these days)?
> 
> 
> Yes, they are still built but usually take a few days to push (it's
> manual IIRC) so it could prevent you from using a new kernel for a
> little while which is why I use akmods...
> 
> 
>         No errors during install of the package or during the build.
>         There must be something funky in your environment...
> 
>         Not that anything useful/needed should be in /usr/local/include
>         but what are the permissions on it?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     [root@new_pons ~]# ls -l /usr/local | fgrep include
>     drwxr-x---   3 root   root  4096 Aug  3 09:15 include
> 
>  
> Ok, there is a problem but I don't know if it's THE problem. Everyone
> should have read and execute permissions otherwise a normal user won't
> be able to access the directory (and you should never build software as
> root!)
> 
> I've included all the directories as you should check the others as well:
> 
> $ ll /usr/local
> total 40
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Aug  1 17:45 bin
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb  3  2016 etc
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb  3  2016 games
> drwxr-xr-x.  6 root root 4096 Feb 18 07:27 include
> drwxr-xr-x.  7 root root 4096 Feb 18 07:27 lib
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb  3  2016 lib64
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb  3  2016 libexec
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb 18 07:27 sbin
> drwxr-xr-x. 12 root root 4096 Aug  1 17:45 share
> drwxr-xr-x.  2 root root 4096 Feb  3  2016 src
> 
> A "chmod 0755 /usr/local/include" should fix that particular error, but
> like I said, there's no telling if that's the underlying problem.

To be really complete, I'd suggest (as the root user):

	# chmod 755 /usr/local/include
	# find /usr/local/include -type d -exec chmod 755 \{\} \;
	# find /usr/local/include -type f -exec chmod 644 \{\} \;

This would make /usr/local/include and all _directories_ under
it mode "rwxr-xr-x". The last command would make all _files_ under
/usr/local/include/* mode "rw-r--r--" (the files don't need execute
privileges).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital    ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
- AIM/Skype: therps2        ICQ: 226437340           Yahoo: origrps2 -
-                                                                    -
-   UNIX is actually quite user friendly.  The problem is that it's  -
-              just very picky of who its friends are!               -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux