Re: hey guys.. ssh/key-gen question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/15/2017 02:01 PM, bruce wrote:
>>
>> Testing Digitalocean
>>
>> I can create a ssh key I can create a remote instance and poulate it
>> with the key to be able to do
>>
>> ssh foo_user@1.2.3.4
>>
>> and access the vm with no issue...
>>
>> however::
>>
>> if i spin up 1.2.3.4, as well as 5.6.7.8
>>
>> how can i be on box 1.2.3.4  and do ssh foo_user@5.6.7.8
>>
>> if i'm spinning up 1.2.3.4  and 5.6.7.8  what do i need to provide in
>> each box o accomplish this!
>
>
> If you use the ssh-agent and you ssh into one instance, you should be able
> to ssh from there to the other instance.  If you're wanting automated ssh
> connections, then you either put the private key on the instances or you'll
> have to create new key pairs and distribute the public keys.  This is pretty
> standard ssh stuff, check the docs.
>

---------------

Hey guys... getting back to say what i did, and it appears to work
I'm spinning up a bunch of temp instances for a project

The instances are up for a few hrs, then destroyed... I've got a
"master" that handles the clients it needs, with the master running a
basic script that currently sequentially performs a bunch of tasks on
the clients. The clients have different "screen" sessions set so I can
"peak" over time at the realtime progress of the different client
running processes..

What I realized I needed was a "quick/dirty" method of allowing the
different masters to be able to ssh/run the client cmds.. thus the
need to be able to spin up the clients with whatever they needed to
already be on the vm when it was created..

so..
every box has the same
/home/foo/.ssh
 id_rsa
 config
 authorized_keys

the authorized_keys file has the contents of the initial id_rsa.pub --
which is the public key
the config file is used to simply "disable" the initial question about
adding the key/client

and yeah, in normal situations, where you have long running VMs.. this
might not be the best. But in this situation, once the work is
accomplished, the VMs are destroyed.

thoughts/comments!

thanks


--------------


> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux