On 07/16/17 22:13, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 07/16/17 20:09, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I just upgraded my "spare" laptop (that's literally the hostname!) and I ran into > > one small problem and one larger problem it seems. > > > > The small problem. I keep my own repository of certain packages not available > > through other means on my main desktop accessed though autofs//nfs. > > > > The software center was able to access the metadata during the download phase but > > system-upgrade apparently didn't download the packages assuming they were > local. I > > remember filing a bug for this with fedup... > > > > The bigger issue is everything says Fedora 26 (/etc/fedora-release) and Gnome > > system information, but when I run dnf it's still looking at the Fedora 25 repos. > > > > Where does dnf look for $releasever? > > > > Looking at the man page for dnf.conf > > $releasever > Refers to the release version of operating system which DNF derives > from information available in RPMDB. > > Is it possible you have multiple entries for fedora-release? > > > That was it! I guess system-upgrade uses a pretty big hammer and doesn't worry > about multiple packages being installed. > > Good... You may want to run "dnf check --duplicates" to see if there are any additional issues. What happened to you should not have happened. The operative word being "should". :-) -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
