On 14.03.2017 17:16, Tom Horsley wrote: > And the consistent names change every single time some > developer decides he just has to rewrite the algorithm > to make it better, or systemd decides to engluph yet > another component and not be backward compatible, or > a kernel developer gets a new motherboard where the > scheme doesn't work and his fix has the side effect > of changing the names on thousands of existing systems, etc. > > There have been at least 3 different "immutable" name > schemes in the short time the whole concept has existed. > > I finally decided to eradicate it and go back to eth0 > and friends because it was infinitely more reliable than > having to discover yet another naming scheme in every damn > release. > > Now my only problem will be that they'll probably keep changing > the name of the kernel option to disable it :-). > This sounds quite disturbing, can someone from the systemd and kernel campus comment here, as Tom claims, whether these are the facts? _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
