Allegedly, on or about 08 January 2017, Justin Moore sent: > Just FYI, if you're trying to deal with a networking dependency (e.g., > you have multiple interfaces and you want to make sure they're all up > before proceeding) that is broken by design and has been marked as > "will not fix" by systemd, from what I can tell. System startup will > proceed as soon as *any* network interfaces are online. Going off on a tangent, does the system allow for you to insert your own extra wait-for-all step as a prerequisite for the supplied wait-for-online (whatever it's actually named) service? Surely there's a need for users to be able to put holds into some of the various /wait-for-it/ targets. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 Boilerplate: All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages posted to the mailing list. Lucky for you I typed this, you'd never be able to read my handwriting. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
