On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:08:50 -0800 Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/06/2017 11:57 AM, stan wrote: > > Is there a way to make the kernel boot in deterministic fashion > > again? Everything will be done sequentially, and no task will kick > > off if its predecessors are not done. > > I think I know the answer, but I'm going to ask anyway: why? I'm > asking because there's probably more than one way to do it (There > usually is in Linux.) and the best way will depend on what you need. So I can be assured that variation in the boot process is eliminated as a factor in any problem I'm seeing. To use the NetworkManager case as an example, I boot with multi-thread, see the error, save the boot record. Then, boot with single thread / process, don't get the error, and save the boot record. Compare them, and the clue to what is going wrong is highlighted. When I looked at the options, no obvious way to do this popped out, so I thought I would tap the collective wisdom. If you know more than one, I'd be happy to hear them all. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
