On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 17:40 -0700, stan wrote: > > I doubt that the dependencies are "fuzzy". What would that even mean? > > AFAIK they define a partial order and each process just executes as > > soon as it can. That's why the physical order can vary. > > You just defined what I meant by 'fuzzy', much better than I did. I simply meant that the dependencies are not fuzzy (they don't say e.g. "wait till foo is nearly ready"), but that the order of execution is not completely defined. No matter. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx