Re: Is there a way to specify that boot should be deterministic instead of using threads?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:02:32 +0000
Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I doubt that the dependencies are "fuzzy". What would that even mean?
> AFAIK they define a partial order and each process just executes as
> soon as it can. That's why the physical order can vary.

You just defined what I meant by 'fuzzy', much better than I did.

> You want a way for the partial ordering to be converted to a fixed
> total ordering under control of some option, but I don't know if
> that's possible without rewriting a lot of systemd rules.

I don't want to go there.  So, I'll find an alternative.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]
  Powered by Linux