2016-12-07 12:27 GMT+01:00, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:34:19 +0000 > Andy Blanchard wrote: > >> It doesn't *need* it, but apparently the packager thinks dnf is easier >> to use with it installed which seems a bit arbitary. > > Actually, dnf is one of the commands that is most screwed > up by bash-completion. The completion algorithm for dnf > doesn't believe you can install rpm packages from the > local filesystem, so filename completion after "dnf install" > doesn't work. Are you sure about this? It seems to work here with bash-completion-2.1-8.20150513git1950590.fc23.noarch _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
