On 11/8/16, Mark Haney <mark.haney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've been told repeatedly that BTRFS isn't production ready. I've used it > here on a handful of servers and had nothing but trouble with it, > stability-wise. I sure as hell wouldn't use it on /boot if I can't trust > it for /home or /. Name me one piece of software that is totally bug-free. H*ck, IBM's JFS ate my data on OS/2 one day, on a "stable" piece of software. Thanks to still-undiscovered APAR ... http://comp.os.os2.bugs.narkive.com/ypcAmVsk/xr-c005-is-out APAR=PJ29386 JFS_WRITE CAUSES TRAP 0003 DURING A DIRECTORY WRITE APAR=PJ29609 EXCEPTION IN MODULE JFS - TRAP 0003 IN ***@4 ALSO FIXES SEVERAL HANG PROBLEMS APAR=PJ29664 TRAP IN JFS FS32_OPENCREATE WHEN OPENING A FILE WITH FILENAME THAT CONTAINS A WILDCARD. JFS had its own share of issues on AIX, too http://pages.citebite.com/u5o6e0o7trmi That's what FUD is about, anyway. Repeat gossip in order to stop more people to install a given piece of software, which in turn would have helped to identify potential bugs and have them fixed faster. Aka "the self-fulfilling prophecy". But hey, Google must be full of dumb people... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DplcPrQjvA http://marc.merlins.org/linux/talks/2015/Btrfs-LCA2015/Btrfs.pdf Anyway... I've been told repeatedly that btrfs causes cpu overheating, exhausts batteries and kills puppies. FC _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
