On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:30:54PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Fedora/RedHat's stance on btfs is "passive agressive" (Not Invented Here > Syndrome). That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. It's just never been ready, which is something we know because we kept asking the upstream devs and they kept saying "not yet, please", until they finally said "look, please stop asking". Meanwhile RHEL (and Fedora Server) use XFS, which was *definitely* not invented at Red Hat or by Fedora. > Don't get me wrong, there are many things to like about RedHat/Fedora, but > BTRFS support is not one of them. While I definitely disagree with your characterization above, this I do agree with. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
