Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one > of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. It's just never been ready, > which is something we know because we kept asking the upstream devs and > they kept saying "not yet, please", until they finally said "look, > please stop asking". :-) > While I definitely disagree with your characterization above, this I > do agree with. Well, I did try btrfs on openSUSE ~1yr ago with 13.2 and then with Tumbleweed and although using snapper for supposedly easy-rollback after broken update, I had experience that update to GNOME did break my desktop and was not able to recover it despite having several snapshots which finally led me (back) to Debian. With Debian (Sid), however, isntaller cannot cope with btrfs for anyhting more than basic hard disk layouts…in my case I wanted to do btrfs/raid1 using subvolumes for @root and @home - something which Anaconda did very well, so from my experience I’d say that Fedora’s support is superb. ;) Sincerely, Gour -- He who is satisfied with gain which comes of its own accord, who is free from duality and does not envy, who is steady in both success and failure, is never entangled, although performing actions. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
