On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >>> >>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which >>> this output makes sense. >>> >> I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it >> drops them from the attempt. > > > But why is it trying to include them in the first place? There are no > older versions of those packages installed, and they're not dependencies > of the packages that are being updated. That's why I requested the debugdata so we know exact dependencies and your system state where you can reproduce the problem ;). It shows updating + skipped section together and should show all packages that could be updated (like output of check-upgrade). Honza _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
