On 19 December 2015 at 05:39, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 18 December 2015, Fernando Cassia sent: >> Thanks for the reply. I choose to stop using so-called "persistent >> storage" because it eventually goes FUBAR. Something about the loop >> device if I remember correctly. The issue being that all is well until >> you fill up all available storage space. Then the "persistent storage" >> partition becomes "damaged" and unmountable. I lost quite a few >> folders full of work that way, that's when I decided that was useless. > > That sounds like a problem I had on my old Amiga, more than a decade > ago, where due to some programmer's maths errors, it'd try to fill a > disc to 101% capacity. > > Though, in this case, I suspect it's more to do with flash drives losing > capacity, over time, as it wears out, and no file system being developed > in mind of this (so that a reasonable large amount of space is always > required to be kept free). It's neither of these, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB#Data_persistence 'currently implemented (as a Device-mapper copy-on-write snapshot), every single change to it (writes AND deletes) subtracts from its free space, so it will eventually be "used up"' This is not the same as choosing to create a live image with an accompanying filesystem on a USB key, where the extra mounted filesystem is an ext4 or similar. But system files in a live image are located in the squashfs and are subject to the overlay limits. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
