On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:45:09AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change... > >> > >> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not, > >> which prevents you from building kernel modules for other kernel releases. > >> > >> Was there a good reason for this change in behavior? > > This is not true. > > > > $ rpm -q kernel-devel | sort > > kernel-devel-4.0.4-202.fc21.x86_64 > > kernel-devel-4.1.5-200.fc22.x86_64 > > kernel-devel-4.1.6-200.fc22.x86_64 > > kernel-devel-4.1.6-201.fc22.x86_64 > > kernel-devel-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 > > kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 > > > > Maybe you are confusing with kernel-headers? If that is the case, it > > has been like that for ages. And usually that should not be a problem, > > specially between minor releases (as is the case for a given Fedora > > release). > > > > I think you had not read the entire thread before you responded. We later discovered him to be on F21 and indeed on my F21 VM I confirmed.... Indeed! I noticed after I had responded. I guess a backport bug report is in order against dnf. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
