On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change... >> >> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not, >> which prevents you from building kernel modules for other kernel releases. >> >> Was there a good reason for this change in behavior? > This is not true. > > $ rpm -q kernel-devel | sort > kernel-devel-4.0.4-202.fc21.x86_64 > kernel-devel-4.1.5-200.fc22.x86_64 > kernel-devel-4.1.6-200.fc22.x86_64 > kernel-devel-4.1.6-201.fc22.x86_64 > kernel-devel-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 > kernel-devel-4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 > > Maybe you are confusing with kernel-headers? If that is the case, it > has been like that for ages. And usually that should not be a problem, > specially between minor releases (as is the case for a given Fedora > release). > I think you had not read the entire thread before you responded. We later discovered him to be on F21 and indeed on my F21 VM I confirmed.... [root@f21 dnf]# rpm -q kernel kernel-4.0.7-200.fc21.x86_64 kernel-4.1.6-100.fc21.x86_64 kernel-4.1.7-100.fc21.x86_64 [root@f21 dnf]# rpm -q kernel-devel kernel-devel-4.1.7-100.fc21.x86_64 [root@f21 dnf]# uname -r 4.1.7-100.fc21.x86_64 F22, on the other hand, is "better" -- In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from computers altogether. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
