On 09/27/2015 02:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/27/2015 07:44 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> something that would be easy and fix 99% of >> all problems like this. > > Would it? The people who pushed the update to stable definitely knew > that it required a version of sqlite that hasn't been released yet. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16455 > > What would stop them from doing the same thing under any other > system? You can imagine one that wouldn't allow an update to move > into "stable" if its dependencies weren't met, but then how do you > handle circular dependencies? > -- and firefox & sqlite were both just updated... -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
