Re: upgrading from f21 to f22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/15 19:03, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/08/2015 07:59, Paolo Galtieri a écrit :
>> I have a laptop which was running F19.  I have upgraded it to F20
>> using fedup and then upgraded from f20 to f21 using fedup.  This all
>> worked quite well.  I'm now trying to upgrade to f22 using fedup. When
>> I run
>>
>> fedup --network f22
>>
>> I get a bunch of messages (expected) and then I get the following:
>>
>> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
>>   broken dependencies
>>     firewalld-config-workstation-0.3.14.2-2.fc21.noarch requires
>> firewalld-0.3.14.2-2.fc21.noarch
>>     sox-plugins-nonfree-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64 requires
>> sox-plugins-nonfree-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64
>>     perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.15-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
>> perl-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64, perl-libs-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64
>>     sox-plugins-freeworld-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64 requires
>> sox-plugins-freeworld-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64
>>     coccinelle-1.0.0-2.1.fc21.x86_64 requires
>> ocaml-pcre-7.0.2-7.fc21.x86_64, ocaml-runtime-4.01.0-24.fc21.x86_64
>>     perl-PlRPC-0.2020-15.fc20.noarch requires
>> perl-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64
>> These packages may have problems after the upgrade.
>> Finished. Reboot to start the upgrade, or 'fedup --resetbootloader' to
>> abort.
>>
>> Here's what's installed:
>>
>> firewalld.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                 installed
>> firewalld-config-workstation.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                
>> installed
>> firewalld-filesystem.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                 installed
>>
>> sox-plugins-freeworld.x86_64 14.4.1-4.fc21                   installed
>> sox-plugins-nonfree.x86_64 14.4.1-4.fc21                   installed
>>
>> ocaml-pcre.x86_64 7.0.2-7.fc21                     installed
>> ocaml-runtime.x86_64 4.01.0-24.fc21                  installed
>>
>> coccinelle.x86_64 1.0.0-2.1.fc21                  installed
>>
>> perl.x86_64 4:5.18.4-308.fc21               installed
>>
>> Everything seems to be installed, so why am I getting these broken
>> dependencies?
>>
>> Any help is appreciated.
> Did you try to uninstall the problematic packages, make the
> upgrade and re-install them ?
>
> It could be just a problem with the sequence of packages installation.
>
I've seen warnings like this in the past.  When there are such a small number I go ahead with the fedup process and fix the problems afterwards.  Sometimes it is as easy as running "dnf distro-sync" after the fedup.

-- 
It seems most people that say they are "done talking about it" never really are until given the last word.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux