Re: upgrading from f21 to f22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Le 22/08/2015 07:59, Paolo Galtieri a écrit :
> I have a laptop which was running F19.  I have upgraded it to F20
> using fedup and then upgraded from f20 to f21 using fedup.  This all
> worked quite well.  I'm now trying to upgrade to f22 using fedup. When
> I run
>
> fedup --network f22
>
> I get a bunch of messages (expected) and then I get the following:
>
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
>   broken dependencies
>     firewalld-config-workstation-0.3.14.2-2.fc21.noarch requires
> firewalld-0.3.14.2-2.fc21.noarch
>     sox-plugins-nonfree-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64 requires
> sox-plugins-nonfree-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64
>     perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.15-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
> perl-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64, perl-libs-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64
>     sox-plugins-freeworld-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64 requires
> sox-plugins-freeworld-14.4.1-4.fc22.x86_64
>     coccinelle-1.0.0-2.1.fc21.x86_64 requires
> ocaml-pcre-7.0.2-7.fc21.x86_64, ocaml-runtime-4.01.0-24.fc21.x86_64
>     perl-PlRPC-0.2020-15.fc20.noarch requires
> perl-4:5.18.4-308.fc21.x86_64
> These packages may have problems after the upgrade.
> Finished. Reboot to start the upgrade, or 'fedup --resetbootloader' to
> abort.
>
> Here's what's installed:
>
> firewalld.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                 installed
> firewalld-config-workstation.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                
> installed
> firewalld-filesystem.noarch 0.3.14.2-2.fc21                 installed
>
> sox-plugins-freeworld.x86_64 14.4.1-4.fc21                   installed
> sox-plugins-nonfree.x86_64 14.4.1-4.fc21                   installed
>
> ocaml-pcre.x86_64 7.0.2-7.fc21                     installed
> ocaml-runtime.x86_64 4.01.0-24.fc21                  installed
>
> coccinelle.x86_64 1.0.0-2.1.fc21                  installed
>
> perl.x86_64 4:5.18.4-308.fc21               installed
>
> Everything seems to be installed, so why am I getting these broken
> dependencies?
>
> Any help is appreciated.

Did you try to uninstall the problematic packages, make the
upgrade and re-install them ?

It could be just a problem with the sequence of packages installation.

Good luck,

-- 
“One original thought is worth a thousand mindless quotings.”
“Le vrai n'est pas plus sûr que le probable.”

                                              Diogene Laerce


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux