On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:20:13 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.2.0-3.20131101git3b38701.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-13.0.0-6.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.7.7-2.fc20.i686 > > > xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-10.fc20.i686 > > > > > > None of them has been updated!! > > > > Didn't you say you upgraded from F20 to F22? How did you do that? > > YES _HOW_ exactly? With a tool like fedup? > > On Run-level 3: > > > > dnf update > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! Have you had a look at "rpm -qa --last" yet? What does it tell? You can redirect the output to a file or a pipe, such as rpm -qa --last > output.txt rpm -qa --last|less and show it. > > or: > > dnf distro-sync > Last metadata expiration check performed 1:03:22 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 2015. > Error: package directfb-1.6.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libmng.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed. > package pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.i686 requires itext(x86-32) >= 2.1.7-6, but none of the providers can be installed directfb has been retired after Fedora 19: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/directfb.git/plain/dead.package pdftk has been retired after Fedora 19, too: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pdftk.git/plain/dead.package It seems you haven't cleaned up your installation for a very long time. There have been tools to do that. Even "yum list extras" has been popular. "dnf list extras" also exists. > > Also verify "dnf repolist" and /etc/fedora-release so that you're > > really using Fedora 22 repos. Did you ignore this step deliberately? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
