Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




===========================================================================
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdupre@xxxxxxx
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================


> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt" <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Update 20 -> 22, failure
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:06:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > OK.
> > But, since it work with the Live Version. Why should I use
> > other drivers.
> > In my opinion, it is "just" a configuration issue.
> > From 20 to 22, something is different!!
> 
> It _should_ just work. Did you need to configure anything when
> running the Live version? No. Why would you want to configure
> anything for your installation then?

Starx would like to configure, but crashes.

> Opening lots of individual threads on this mailing-list will
> not lead to much. It only creates a mess as the few bits of
> data about your h/w and s/w are spread in many places. And
> nobody knows what you've done to your F20 installation anyway.
> 
> Try collecting details. Which "Live Version" exactly does work?
Live 22 Workstation i686
> Refer to it with its full name and architecture. When running
> it, you can examing its log files, too. Compare with your
> broken installation. Your problem description is still poor.
Just tell me exactly which files a should compare?
Live does not seems to create much files in /etc/X11
I am not anymore in front of machine right now, because I needed to move.

> The X server logs are still missing. No sign of booting with
> SELinux set to permissive mode either to work around the errors
> you get.
Just tell me exactly which files a should check?
Should I run restorecon?

> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux