On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:41:48PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 22.07.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > That said, I sometimes do not understand what's the harm in getting > > updates few hours later. dnf already tells you how old the metadata is > > when it starts, you can choose to get the latest metadata if it is too > > old. So what's the big deal? > > I usually update weekly (or at least once within two weeks). And since > F22, I get "nothing to do" every time I do this - although there are > updates waiting. Which is.. annoying. So every time I have to clean > the cache to be able to update. This is strange. I see very different behaviour. I update once every 2 days or so. Usually my metadata is a few hours old. Here are some examples: On my laptop: # dnf check-update Last metadata expiration check performed 2:01:15 ago on Wed Jul 22 15:47:25 2015. and I have a bunch of updates waiting. On my home server: # dnf check-update Last metadata expiration check performed 1:19:48 ago on Wed Jul 22 16:30:00 2015. with approximately similar set of updates waiting. On an old laptop which I have not updated in some time. $ sudo dnf check-update [sudo] password for jallad: Last metadata expiration check performed 2:29:02 ago on Wed Jul 22 15:22:05 2015. a much larger set of updates awaiting. My local time is, 2015-07-22 17:54:30. So they are all within 2-3 hours. That is why I find your case a bit puzzling. Maybe it is worthwhile to file a bugzilla. To be complete, I have no metadata related options set in dnf.conf or yum.conf. Maybe you have something like that set? Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
