----- Original Message ----- > From: "Suvayu Ali" <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx> > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:58:05 AM > Subject: Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:01:37 +0200 > > Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:39:36 -0500, Javier Perez wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, just did a dnf clean all , and the dnf update and the updates > > > > showed up > > > > > > > > Weird. > > > > > > Just some hours before your post I had sent this: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/463183.html > > > > Michael is right: all we are a mass of lame > > I have shamed very much reading his answer to me; I have posted w/out RTFM > > and > > who do not RTFM should be banned like in old good irc times > > Unfortunately Michael, this `yum/dnf clean all' business will never go > away. I remember there was a time on this list, when everytime someone > suggested that, they got corrected. But all the people who used to do > the correction are tired of repeating themselves, myself included. It's > a lost cause. > -- > Suvayu > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. > IIUUC, this is not completely true. I believe that once both PackageKit and DNF are integrated with the new CAShe [1], we will *be able* to improve this situation [2]. [1] https://github.com/james-antill/CAShe [2] If users/Fedora will be OK with downloading repomd.xml more often. -- Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
