Re: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 05/28/2015 09:23 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: "jd1008" <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jd1008@xxxxxxxxx>>
    > > To: "Fedora Community Users Support"
    <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > > >
    > > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
    > > Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
    > >
    > > # dnf distro-sync
    > > Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s |  41 MB     00:13
    > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
    > > Updates    1.1 kB/s |
    > > 399
    > > B     00:00
    > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree -
    > > Updates 2.8 kB/s | 399
    > >  B
    > > 00:00
    > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 -
    > > Free            955
    > > kB/s |
    > > 551 kB     00:00
    > > Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' from
    > > 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released
    > > -f22&arch=x86_64':
    > > Cannot download repomd.xml: Curl error (56): Failure when
    receiving
    > > data
    > > from the peer for
    > > ftp://mirror.lstn.net/fedora/updates/22/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
    > > [response reading failed]
    >
    > I guess that this is the same as
    > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220269 even though it
    > happened at another time.

    I'm getting repeated failures of this type:

    Failure when receiving data from the peer for
    ftp://ftp.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/22/x86_64/os/Packages/k/kde-l10n-14.12.3-6.fc22.noarch.rpm
    [response reading failed]

    I get the same even after "dnf clean all", and it happens with update,
    install, distro-sync, ...




64-bit issue? I've had no issues with 32-bit.
I do not think it is a 'bitness' issue. I think it is a recurring issue with
every new release. Packages that are well and good in previous release
are not all recompiled for the new release and placed in the repos.
Also, during the first week or two of a new release, the servers are
extremely busy being updated, and they are not able to respond
quickly enough to the clients, and the clients time out and declare
their inability to download something.

--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux