On 02/25/2015 09:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
If people aren't actually going to test what we have, and file bug
report,
If you want to see this thing fixed, tested and see bug reports, then
publish updates on a regular basis. Monthly network installer iso
images, for instance.
Stability and trustworthiness are immensely more valuable in a GUI
installer than "expert" features;
I once again disagree. This is populism and over-generalization.
"80% of all US-American eat burgers twice a week => all we need is to
support burgers - Mind you?"
And yes, an aspect, we haven't yet discussed is the look'n'feel of the
GUI - Sure, this is personal taste, I do not consider the anaconda GUI
changes as improvements.
let alone "expert" features that
only sometimes work.
Once again: I feel you are trying to have "smart" features - This is not
what "experts" want - They want full control, should be able to cope
with errors, so all you'd have to do would be to enable them to to so.
Unfortunately, I can't see this in recent installers.
Ralf
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
