On 12/03/14 21:47, Richard Ibbotson wrote: > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote: >> Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment..... I don't >> think they have their act fully together at this time. > Disabled those and it says... > > Skip-broken could not solve problems > Error: Package: mpv-0.3.11-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates/20) > Requires: libass.so.4()(64bit) > Removing: libass-0.10.1-4.fc20.x86_64 (@fedora/20) > libass.so.4()(64bit) > Updated By: libass-0.12.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) > ~libass.so.5()(64bit) > > ** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output > follows: > OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- > libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 > SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with > SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 > augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- > libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 > avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi- > libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64 > basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with > basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch > bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with > bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64 > 32:bind-license-9.9.6-3.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with 32:bind- > license-9.9.4-15.P2.fc20.noarch > > Is there a clever YUM command that can fix this ? Was thinking I might > have to just re-install the system to upgrade. > package-cleanup --cleandupes -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
