On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote:
> Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment..... I don't
> think they have their act fully together at this time.
Disabled those and it says...
Skip-broken could not solve problems
Error: Package: mpv-0.3.11-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates/20)
Requires: libass.so.4()(64bit)
Removing: libass-0.10.1-4.fc20.x86_64 (@fedora/20)
libass.so.4()(64bit)
Updated By: libass-0.12.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (fedora)
~libass.so.5()(64bit)
** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output
follows:
OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR-
libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64
SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with
SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64
augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas-
libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64
avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi-
libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64
basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with
basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch
bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with
bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64
32:bind-license-9.9.6-3.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with 32:bind-
license-9.9.4-15.P2.fc20.noarch
Is there a clever YUM command that can fix this ? Was thinking I might
have to just re-install the system to upgrade.
--
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
