On 1 December 2014 at 16:27, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: >> >> My question was "What part(s) of the systemd suite has not been adopted". >> Note the not part. > > > Yes. I understood that fine. I was pointing out which parts have been > adopted so you can count the rest as not adopted. There are several > different components which haven't been adopted nor even proposed because > they are simply not yet ready or not general purpose enough to be used by > default. > >>> >>> when they are actually proposed, a discussion about them would be >>> warranted. >> >> >> I.e. it might very well be adopted and therefor a discussion about it is >> in order. Why wait for the inevitable? > > > That makes no sense. You don't discuss developmental features of upstream > projects in a users list. >> >> >> This is not about a test or development release. It is about new >> functionality finding its way into systemd > > > Precisely why it is even more offtopic to discuss them here. This list is > meant for helping users on general releases of Fedora. Any features that are > not part of the general releases of Fedora is not suitable for discussion > here. We wrote up the list guidelines for a reason. Please follow them. > Where should users be discussing things that may negatively impact them? On the systemd list they will get shouted down by systemd cheerleaders, on the devel list they will get told the decision has already been made and they should go to the systemd list. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
