On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:35:36 +0200 Heinz Diehl <htd+ml@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04.10.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Anecdotally also, it appears to be true. Without the resume = UUID > > stuff, it does not wake up from hibernate but goes on to reboot. > > I tried both with and without the resume device in grub.conf, and my > system showd identical behaviour: it went into hibernation, and after > pressing the start button, it began to boot and finally loaded the > image from the disk. It has always been this way for me. Just curious, > since I have little experience with hibernation: is there something > which should have happened instead? Thank you for your e-mail! For me, since Fedora 20, it has been the case (for all Fedora aptops that I have -- four) that hibernate does not resume without the workaround mentioned in that thread. It goes back and boots. The "problem"/"feature" only arose since Fedora 20 -- no intervention was needed till Fedora 19. The same is true for Debian-based systems which my wife runs. Perhaps this is a consequence of using non-vanilla kernels (like Windoze, Debian-based and now Fedora-based systems appear to now want to tell us what is good for us and not), so maybe I should try with a vanilla kernel and see. Anyway, my irqbalance issue has been back. I sent e-mail to the thread yesterday including my dmesg, my lsmod and lspci -v but it was too long (199KB) and the message is being held for "moderator approval". It, however, came up for five times with those messages and the network, but the sixth time, it simply rebooted. I don't have dmesg for this one. What is the difference between the Fedora vanilla kernels (as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel_Vanilla_Repositories) and the kernel on kernel.org, would you happen to know? Many thanks again! Ranjan PS: here is the sum of my previous message: Message from syslogd at Oct 5 08:47:23 ... kernel:[51883.675020] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Message from syslogd at Oct 5 08:47:23 ... kernel:do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) I am going to look into erasing irqbalance, but I thought that I would see if anyone had any ideas from the dmesg, lspci and lsmod. For this one time, the machine seems to work. Btw, maybe my bug reports did not address the correct component (kernel) but they have not been assigned yet. (Should I file under irqbalance?) Many thanks, Ranjan I have put the three outputs up using fpaste. dmesg: 08:03:02~$ fpaste dmesg.txt Uploading (270.6KiB)... http://ur1.ca/iawmi -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/139547/00617141 $ fpaste lsmod.txt Uploading (5.8KiB)... http://ur1.ca/iawn1 -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/139549/26007721 $ fpaste lspci.txt Uploading (8.6KiB)... http://ur1.ca/iawn3 -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/139550/26008001 ____________________________________________________________ Publish your photos in seconds for FREE TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if4 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
