On 12.09.2014 18:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:56:34 +0200 > poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 12.09.2014 10:06, Anders Wegge Keller wrote: >>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:37:13 -0600 >>> Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, sorry you think so. I think systemd is far from perfect, but >>>> it's a good deal better than what we had before. >>> >>> Do you know of a place where I can find the analysis behind this >>> assessment, or is it just your personal opinion? For me, the >>> limited gains, are far exceeded by the additional risk and >>> complexities that comes as part of the bundle. I'd really like to >>> see your analysis as to why systemd is better for your use case. >>> Then I'll tell you in detail why it doesn't at all improve my >>> situation. >> >> In this respect, can you and mister Ihnat provide us a comparison >> study? > > I know of no such study. I'm not sure what or how you could even do > something around this. It's a technical decision... > > kevin > Man, I wasn't called out you, but when you reply, this whole "debate" is a one big " ", pro et contra, neither the first nor the last, without actual numbers it's just a bunch of archetypes and clichés. poma -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
