On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 16:21:51 +0200,
Heinz Diehl <htd+ml@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages
that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that
need to get rebuilt in order to link with the updated mesa. I can believe
that the latter set could get you over 20 packages.
[htd@kiera ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i "mesa"
mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
mesa-filesystem-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libEGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.i686
mesa-dri-drivers-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libxatracker-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libGLU-devel-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64
mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686
Wrt the mix of 32/64 bit packages (on my system), I would consider
rebuilding them a nightmare..
Those aren't all separate packages. A single package can be associated with
more than one rpm. When you run rpmbuild on a package, it builds all of
the rpms for it at once.
However as I mentioned, there are packages that depend on mesa that are
going to need to be rebuilt as well, and that could add up.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
