On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages > that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that > need to get rebuilt in order to link with the updated mesa. I can believe > that the latter set could get you over 20 packages. [htd@kiera ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i "mesa" mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686 mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686 mesa-filesystem-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libglapi-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libEGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-9.0.0-4.fc19.i686 mesa-dri-drivers-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686 mesa-libgbm-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libxatracker-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-devel-9.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libGL-devel-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.x86_64 mesa-libEGL-9.2.4-1.20131128.fc19.i686 Wrt the mix of 32/64 bit packages (on my system), I would consider rebuilding them a nightmare.. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
