Rahul Sundaram writes:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: One of the problems with NM, in my view, is that it tries to do too much.This is one of the things that NM addresses with plugins so you can pick and choose which features you want out of it. Also by integrating with existing tools, you don't have to go all or nothing. As I noted earlier, in Rawhide and Fedora 21, packages have already been split up.
Just wondering what I have to look forward to after upgrading a working Fedora 20 server, that currently sets up all network interfaces with static IP addresses, from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg*; including several <ifname>:1 aliases, and including /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules which assigned the right network interface name to the appropriate hardware network port – which has worked for about a decade now – to Fedora 21.
So, what exactly would be the probability of the server figuring out how to get back up on its network, after upgrading to Fedora 21; just wondering my chances.
Attachment:
pgpLENYp4wjhT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
