On 06/16/14 04:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/16/14 16:37, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> So there is still a considerable difference in what each of them does here,
I ran into this the other day. It would seem the way dnf handles caching is different from yum. Not 100% sure/convinced this "fixed" my problem....but after running "dnf clean expire-cache" it then reported the same thing as yum.
Yes, [root@box10 bobg]# dnf clean expire-cache
Yields the same update list this morning, only two items in this case.
But it seems to eat up any time saved by running dnf instead of yum.
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux/XFCE
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
