On 06/16/2014 03:23 PM, Paul Knox-Kennedy wrote:
On 06/16/14 04:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/16/14 16:37, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
So there is still a considerable difference in what each of them
does here,
I ran into this the other day. It would seem the way dnf
handles caching is different from yum. Not 100%
sure/convinced this "fixed" my problem....but after running
"dnf clean expire-cache" it then reported the same thing as yum.
I will try that next time, thanks.
Bob
Dnf defaults to 48h metadata expiry. Yum default is much shorter (I
found a reference saying it is 1.5h, but don't know if this is still
true).
You can set metadata_expire in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf - I dropped it to 6h.
/etc/dnf/dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=100
best=1
deltarpm=1
debuglevel=10
errorlevel=10
metadata_expire=0
metadata_timer_sync=0
Regardless, its output is still ugly compared to yum daisies.
Long live the yum!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
