On 06/15/14 19:02, Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 18:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> OK.... I read FAQ..... >> >> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-update-vs-yum-update >> >> And the one following it.... "Is it possible to force DNF to get the >> latest metadata on dnf upgrade?" >> >> Running KDE and the notifications in the systray showed there are 12 >> updates available. Figured I give dnf a try, which I've done from >> time to time, but it showed no packages to update. OK....so clean >> metadata for both yum and dnf.... >> >> ran both "yum check-update" and "dnf check-update". >> >> yum listed the 12 > And dnf offered nothing... > > Is this just a case of whatever generates the metadata that yum uses, > and whatever else generates the metadata that dnf uses, do their > generation at different times? Or do they actually have a different set > of package files to look through? > > I can't help but wonder what changing from yum to dnf will do for mirror > sites. Are we going to see a prolonged period where various mirrors > stagnate? > Right.... But, now it does.... I thought "clean metadata" would have done it.... But, clean expire-cache seems to have done the trick. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
