On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 18:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > OK.... I read FAQ..... > > http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-update-vs-yum-update > > And the one following it.... "Is it possible to force DNF to get the > latest metadata on dnf upgrade?" > > Running KDE and the notifications in the systray showed there are 12 > updates available. Figured I give dnf a try, which I've done from > time to time, but it showed no packages to update. OK....so clean > metadata for both yum and dnf.... > > ran both "yum check-update" and "dnf check-update". > > yum listed the 12 And dnf offered nothing... Is this just a case of whatever generates the metadata that yum uses, and whatever else generates the metadata that dnf uses, do their generation at different times? Or do they actually have a different set of package files to look through? I can't help but wonder what changing from yum to dnf will do for mirror sites. Are we going to see a prolonged period where various mirrors stagnate? -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.14.6-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Sun Jun 8 02:14:30 UTC 2014 i686 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
